In Japan, there is a continuos increase in the specific gravity of subcultures including the internet as well as the media, as the ground for formation of the discourse to deny the existence of Japanese Military Sexual Slavery. Especially, the emergence of subcultures regarding Japanese Military Sexual Slavery was triggered after Yoshinori Kobayashi started to draw a cartoon about the Japanese Military Sexual Slavery issue in the 1990s. Kobayashi is a Japanese famous cartoonist and a social practitioner that works for the ‘circle for making new historical textbooks’. Therefore, for Kobayashi, as a social practitioner and a cartoonist, cartoon was the ground for a knowledge discourse produced by an intellectual. Also, New Gomanism Declaration triggered the formation of ‘reader participatory discourses’. During the period of transition from this participatory culture to the ‘convergence culture’ to create discourses mutually via diverse media platforms in the 1990s, Kobayashi’s discourse on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery became a best seller and so far, this has been extensively established, as a knowledge discourse. Then why has the Japanese Military Sexual Slavery discourse formed in the 1990s been continued so far? For Kobayashi, Japanese Military Sexual Slavery from colonized countries have to be voluntary prostitutes not to make the Japanese army in the Pacific War rapists. When Japanese Military Sexual Slavery are prostitutes, the Japanese army’s sexual violence, rape and forced mobilization are not validated. He considers that in so doing, Japan can regain its honor. It is significant that the distorted patriotism and the arguments stressing epic poetry for boosting pride of Japanese people in Kobayashi’s works have been sharing the same tone of arguments with right-wing literature which emerged along with the conservative swing of Japanese political circles in the 2000s.